How to unite “Malays” – Part 1

(Beware, one long post ahead)

Remember Michael Chick? The same author behind “Who is a Malay” is back and I got this in my inbox couple of weeks ago from him but been too busy to post them. But all the talk about UMNO – PAS unity, Malay unity, one party for all Malays had bring this article by Michael Chick to be more relevant.

Why talk about uniting only Malays when there is a more urgent need to unite all Malaysians?

Note 1: Once again presented verbatim but with minor adjustments to spelling & grammars

Note 2: For further details, please contact the author at drmichaelchick@gmail.com

Note 3: All image source – Michael Chick

Note 4: The long post is broken into 2 parts in this blog

Who are the Malays? And how to unite them

By Michael Chick

Follow up to the First Article; it is time to define who the “Malays” really are and to correctly define them.

To begin with, let us look at the subject of “Race”. Since Hitler’s Days of propagating the “Superiority” of the Aryan Race, many have scorned from the very mention of the very word “race” itself.

However, certain Malaysian Political Parties still seems to relish in its’ very notion of separation. Strangely, they go all out to “Divide and Rule” – uniting one race in particular, but not the rest of the country. And they spend lots of time, money and effort to this redundant and lost cause.

Anthropology defines only 5 Races in the World (use your favourite search engine). The Caucasoids, Negroids, Mongoloids, Dravidic, and Austronesians. Any other species is merely a combination of the above 5 main groupings. Geographically, Malaysia falls within the Austronesian category.

(Austronesian-Lands)

Brown skinned people, residing in countries such as Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia, Thailand, Burma, Cambodia, Vietnam, Philippines, Brunei, Polynesian Islands, Tahiti, Hawaii and so forth. In fact, it is next to impossible to differentiate the Austronesian People, regardless of the country they come from. However, if there is a certain distinctive physical facial feature, which identifies anyone from any locality; it is usually a case of the gene pool not coming from a wide enough resource. Put bluntly, Incest, or Inbreeding (as Mahathir so aptly put it, in the greater sense of the definition, in his book, “The Malay Dilemma”) – inter-marrying from within the same community.

However, some still believe that it is essential that cousins should marry each other to protect the “Blue-Blood”, and/ or to prevent family property from ever leaving the clan. This unfortunately is in stark contrast to the Mongoloid practice where two people with even the same family names are prohibited from marrying.

In fact, once you remove the nationalities from the Austronesians, you will find a vast interesting and diverse group of people and from the many ornate costumes, to the vast number of religions and cultural practices. The very essence of the Austronesian Culture is bound to intoxicate every observer. One other category, which seems to confuse the issue, is the existence of whom locals call the “Orang Asli”. Technically known as “Australo Melanesians”, they are the direct descendants of the East Africans who migrated out of Laetoli, Africa circa 60,000 years ago. You will also find it impossible to distinguish between an Australian Aborigine, The Malaysian Negrito, or the Philippine Aeta with the Papuan Tribes.

(Australo-Melanesian)

So you now have two distinct groups. The first to arrive here are the Australo Melanesians, circa 60,000 years ago, and then you have the Austronesians (from Yunan), who arrived in Malaysia circa 3,000 years ago. Cross-Breeding between the two results in a “new” category called the Polynesians. “Poly” meaning “many”, thus accurately describing the many “…sians” which have inter-bred. Caucasians with Austronesians, Australo-Melanesians with Austronesians and so on so forth. For an accurate understudy of Anthropology, country borders are irrelevant, and only serve to create severe delusions of the facts.

As the Austronesian Clusters are so diverse, many individual traits start to form in a localized manner. For the sake of individual Nationalism Spirit, many have mutated from its original form. Others, such as costumes and such have taken on slightly different materials depending on what was locally available to them, and was duly influenced by the spice tradesmen of the West who brought new materials. However, they all have their roots in animism, which is still seen in all of greater Polynesia.

(Sampling of Costumes)

As such, their religions are equally as diverse. True to form, most Austronesian Cultures have still retained many traits during their animistic days. Hinduism also has played an extremely large role in defining rituals, and is most obvious in local Austronesian Wedding Customs. The concept of Sultan and Maharaja (Raja in short) is also of Hindu origins. The Sultan is equivalent to the “Son of Heaven” concept of China, therefore, “Duli Yang Maha Mulia” (He who is of Supreme Nobility).

So is the double-handed praying-gesture when addressing someone of importance, or when addressing the King/ Sultan. The local bomoh will attest to a combination of animistic, and pagan practices with Islam. Frowned by authorities, but still permitted to practice; with or without a license. Exorcisms, prediction of lottery numbers, healing the sick are among the many many functions and duties of the local Bomoh. He is also often seen to grace important venues, holding back the rain, or invited to special occasions and functions; sometimes, by the very people who scorn his pagan “superior powers”.

(To be continued)

IPF – at crossroads

(Crossroads – which path to take now? Image source: http://i.treehugger.com)

From theStar today:-

The Indian Progressive Front (IPF) has no intention of joining Pakatan Rakyat, its acting president Puan Sri Jayashree Pandithan said.

Jayashree said IPF would continue to perform the duties and responsibilities to the Indian community in the country.

“I believe MIC president Datuk Seri S. Samy Vellu would not have any objections to our request to be admitted into the ruling coalition,” she said.

Just a question for the good Puan Sri:-

If IPF is not joining Pakatan Rakyat but at the same time is not allowed to join Barisan (thanks to Uncle Sam) and still want to help the community, isn’t better for the party to close shop and start working as a NGO?

Once upon a time, there was not one to fight MIC on issues relating to Indians other than IPF (led by the late Pandithan) but now, with Pakatan Rakyat with multi colored representatives, it is a whole new ball game for IPF & MIC.

Childhood Memories Part 11

(Image source: http://www.pjunion.com)

Please read the rest of the series here

Kentucky vanterechi, Kentucky vanterechi, Kentucky venterechi, Kentucky poyeerechi , Kentucky poyeerechi, Kentucky poyeerechi.

This is the usual “tune” that me and my siblings used to sing as we pass the KFC restaurant along Jalan Kuchai Lama back in the 1980s.

My dad usually take this route when we are coming back from our grandma’s house. There is a KFC restaurant just near the Ajinomoto factory. One day, after he had an extra bonus from his boss, he took us there for a treat. So, whenever we passes this place, we starts to sing the “Kentucky vanterechi, Kentucky vanterechi, Kentucky venterechi” (Kentucky is coming, Kentucky is coming, Kentucky is coming) but our parents would ignore our “songs” and my dad will drive on back to our house.

Fast food was a “high, high” luxury item during that time. As we pass the KFC restaurant, we will sing “Kentucky poyeerechi, Kentucky poyeerechi, Kentucky poyeerechi” (Kentucky is going, Kentucky is going, Kentucky is going). This is the usual thing that we do.

But once my dad surprised us when he heard us singing – he turned to the restaurant and we had fried chickens- our parents did not eat and we all shared one plate.

Bad Reversing

I probably need to open a whole new category…

This morning, I saw a car on the third lane of the highway, reversing because (I guess) the driver has missed the ramp couple of metres away. The car – an old red Proton Saga sedan was reversing but it reversed without any reverse lights or indicators. All it had was brake lights. And traffic on the third lane often travels at speeds up to 80 km/h.

(Image source: http://www.remlapsoftware.com)

If I am travelling on the third lane, from afar, I won’t have realised that the car was actually reversing until it is too late. I would have either hit the car that was reversing or the cars on the second lane when I avoided and skidded onto the second lane. Either way, the end result looks messy.

Thankfully, I was cruising on the first lane and missed the idiot completely. But it is indeed amazing to see the kind of idiots that we encounter on the roads these days.

The Black Dot

Last week, I left this blog with a question “what do you see?”

When I was doing my 3rd year of law, things got more interesting. From the questions “what is the law”, we moved to questions “what is law”. Certainly a drastic change of how we think was needed in the last year of law school (it is also a reason why I liked doing law – there is no straight answer!).

So, there I was – attending the very first class on the third year and we had a very young lecturer taking our class. He explained to us on the overview structure of the studies for the 3rd year, what we need to do, etc and before he left, he left us with an assignment. The “question” was on a blank A4 paper which had nothing but a black dot right in the middle of the paper.

The assignment looked simple enough but it has it’s own challengers – write about what you see on the paper. The assignment must be at least 3,000 words and can be on any topics (but must relate back to the black dot) and it must be handed over within a week.

Those with a lack imagination or creativity seemed doomed from the start. After several failed starts to do the assignment (and of course lazy delays), I gave it a rest and went to watch television, oblivious to the fact that I only had a day to finish the assignment.

Then I had an inspiration and immediately went down to write the assignment and completed it on the same night.

What I did was start the assignment with this quote:-

There is a fifth dimension beyond that which is known to man. It is a dimension as vast as space and as timeless as infinity. It is the middle ground between light and shadow, between science and superstition, and it lies between the pit of man’s fears and the summit of his knowledge. This is the dimension of imagination. It is an area which we call the Twilight Zone.

The above set the premise of my direction of thoughts when talking about the black dot. For me, the black dot was the twilight zone – for the black has interrupted the tranquillity of the white.

The black dot was not the norm; twilight zone was not the norm too. It shared the same characteristics.

I must say that this assignment was one of the tricky assignments that I had during my 3 years of doing law – because it was on an open topic and left purely to one’s imaginations. Having an open mind certainly helped me to pull myself through 3rd year of law school.

Any interesting views?