What is in 10MP?

What a show, my man!

(The problem with Najib is not his ideas but his will power and having the right character to make the actual change. After the stunt he pulled off in Perak, who is going to believe what he says? Image source: http://www.thenutgraph.com)

Najib had tabled the 10th Malaysia Plan yesterday and already there has been nothing but praises to this plan. The former PM, Pak Lah even went one step to say that “the 10th Malaysia Plan is a big leap to a new platform that will bring Malaysia greater success”. But was it really a “big leap”? Can we really put our foot into the “First World” status as mentioned by Najib?

There was no trace of NEM in the 10th Malaysia Plan (PM scared of the Perkasa buggers?) and certain things like lowering the age for primary school does not really means anything if we failed to check on the quality of education (the students will be getting the bullshit at an earlier age now). The 30% bumiputera equity quota is still there (computation of the 30% is still elusive till this day) and despite PM’s promise to closely monitor this, we know that the system has been tainted to the roof and we are only going to go back to square one. MIC was there with Samy Vellu promising to “monitor” the implementation of benefits to the “Indians” (wonder who) as usual – wondered what happened to all the previous monitoring (until Hindraf had to take the issue to the streets).

And in the midst of calls for cost cutting measure, tightening the expenses and wanting to reduce subsidies, some jokers came up with the idea of shifting the Parliament to Putrajaya for a tune RM800 million. If the old Parliament building (which by the way, was recently renovated for millions of ringgit) was completely destroyed (due to fire, etc) we can probably talk about having a new building for the Parliament. But if the old building is still good, then why waste RM800 million?

Whatever Najib have said from his carefully prepared speech in the Parliament actually means nothing to the ordinary people. Why? It is because whatever Najib have said is nothing but a general policy – another politician talk, designed to bring high hopes to various sectors. This is just one man making promises to the nation – whether he can make good of his promise, is another ball game altogether.

The same echoed by Anwar Ibrahim when he said:-

“You may have grand ideas, but whether you can implement it, it’s another thing”

The PM has given his “speech” in the Parliament – the various Ministers have to go back to their Ministries and start formulating how in the hell they are going to implement the plan at Ministry level. They only have framework and perhaps some statistics to work with. And we all know that we have some big time idiots heading some of the Ministries in Malaysia. Once the Minister have done with his Ministry level framework (in months), the buck now will be pushed to the various heads of department who now need to work out the details of implementation and enforcement before the man in the street can start seeing the success of the so-called 10th Malaysia Plan.

What I am saying here is nothing new. In the past, when Prime Ministers announced the Malaysia Plans, almost everyone applaud the “big leap” that the Plan promise to make in the next 5 years. But when it comes to a stage where someone like Idris Jala comes out and say that Malaysia may go bankrupt if nothing major is done, you will realise that whatever “big leap” that was promised ended up as nothing but empty promises.

So, similarly on 10th Malaysia Plan – ya, it sounds good with Najib pointing at various area of economics and promises of high income (which will be necessary if the Government is going pull out the subsidies) and making Malaysia more resilient (ya, throw in juicy words like “first world” whilst you are at it). Ya, it sounds good just like the past Malaysia Plans which saw Malaysia slipping away from the same footing with South Korea and Singapore.

If I was Pak Lah, I would not be so quick to say “big leap” right now – let’s wait for the actual implementation and enforcement. After all, this is Malaysia – we bound to have flip-flop and reversal of policies due to the political reasons.

Read Also

10th Malaysia Plan – Najib, the Sheriff of Nottingham

10MP big numbers that don’t add up


Money for Schools

Here’s why we don’t trust the politicians to handle our future…

(Only in Malaysia…schools in shop lots. Image source: Malaysiakini)

Well, just contrast these reports on the same day:-

The Johor government will build 122 more religious schools which are estimated to cost about RM200mil.

“They will be completed within the next two years,” Mentri Besar Datuk Abdul Ghani Othman said. At present, there are 552 religious schools in the state.

Speaking to newsmen after launching the Religious Teachers Day celebrations here yesterday, he said the state government had spent about RM40mil in the past five years to improve facilities in religious schools.



Private firms have been urged to each “adopt” at least one of the 523 Tamil schools nationwide which are in dire need of funds for maintenance, Malaysia Nanban reported.

Deputy Minister in Prime Minister’s Department Datuk T. Murugiah said more firms should come forward to allocate money to help these schools.

“Most Tamil schools, especially those in the estates, are in need of funds to repair their premises as they are dependent on allocations from the Education Ministry,” he was reported as saying.


That’s great – 2 types of schools with 2 kinds of treatment, right here in Najib’s so-called 1Malaysia.

In recent days, Najib have been talking about cost cutting measures in tackling the issue of cutting down the subsidies (we are not buying the bullshit though – politicians can promise the heaven but until they take the right first steps and enforce the right policies, they can bullshit until the sky turns pink).

Is it worth spending another RM200 million on new religious schools when the existing schools are in dire straits? I don’t have anything against religion but given the trend of the world today, do we really need more religion “specialists” instead of more scientists, doctors, engineers or other professionals?

How about basic education on Science, Maths and Language?

Instead wasting money on religious and Tamil and etc schools, can the Government just cut the bullshit and force everyone to go to fully funded national schools where facilities can be well maintained, education quality is set to the highest level and unity among young Malaysians are further fostered? Why the gamble on the next generation’s future? We already took the wrong step by reversing on the decision to teach Maths and Science in English (and yet we hear “traces” of call to bring this back). So, what’s next?

And one day when the Government decides to cut down on the subsidies, we really wonder whether the money saved from all these subsidies would be channelled back to strengthening our education system. Or will it be “distributed to its goons” as many is predicting?

By the way, Murugiah’s call for private firms to “adopt’ Tamil schools is a wasteful endeavour. We have a bad track record when it comes to sponsorships. In Malaysia, nothing is done for free unless there is a profit to be made or kick-backs given somewhere. Instead of asking the private firms, why can’t the Government itself take over these schools and turn it to national school where all Malaysians will have equal opportunity to basic education?

It is scary to wonder on how the Government is going to tackle the allocation of cost when it comes to funding the education for young Malaysians? Are they going to sit down and check on the right priorities? The Government already said that it is not having enough money to go around.

We really don’t need the wasteful endeavours now and certainly we can do with less idiotic politicians running the show in the background.

Read Also

Extra SPM Paper

Support for 1Sekolah

Subsidy Gone But…Part 3

Read the Part 1 and Part 2

This is the exact sentiment on the “ground”:-

If subsidies are removed, there will be more money for the government to distribute to its ‘goons’, says a Malaysian

(Source: Malaysiakini)

This is because there are too many “leeches” still have their money sucking mouth attached to the Government of the day.

What we worry is that once the subsidies are gone, the people are going to pay more and any money saved is going go for the well connected goons’ to sustain their lavish lifestyle (and probably make more millions on the sideline).

Can the Government assure that every single cents saved from subsidies will go directly (or indirectly) into the people’s pockets? Can the Government be accountable and transparent on how the subsidies saved is utilised? Can they?

Subsidy Gone But…Part 2

Read the earlier post here

(More subsidy for the “one of the most profitable” budget airline in the world but less for the people under the Government’s economic masterplan? Image source: http://www.theage.com.au)

OutSyed The Box further reveals:-

So Air Asia is getting a subsidy – for another five years. But Idris just said that subsidies are going to be removed. Macam mana pula ini? And just how much profit does Air Asia make – you may be wondering?

RM256 Million in the first quarter alone?? Wow!! There are four quarters in one year. So RM256 million x 4 = RM1.024 BILLION profit per year. And this corporate giant where the SIL and other cronies are shareholders is going to get subsidised using money that is being taken away from the rakyat? Banyak cantik.

Does Air Asia still owe hundreds of millions of Ringgit to Petronas (for fuel supply) and to Malaysian Airports Bhd (for airport handling services)? That is taxpayer’s money too.

And isn’t it also true that cronies from the regime of Slumberjack have made hundreds of millions in commission payments for all those Airbus jets that Air Asia ordered?

You know – some of those Airbuses which subsequently had to be leased out to other airlines because Air Asia did not have enough routes to fly them? Why buy so many Airbus jets in the first place? Surely if I was paid tens of millions of Ringgit as “commission” for influencing the purchase of Airbus, then I too can build a house on a cliff overlooking the Indian Ocean in Bali. It is not a difficult thing to do isn’t it?

(Catch the whole post here – there are good points raised)

As I said earlier, we are against reduction of subsidies, not because we want the subsidies to be kept going (for ever and ever) but we are against the reduction of subsidies because we know the subsidies saved will not be properly managed. Worst still, subsidies saved may end up in the rich’s pockets

Subsidy Gone But…

We seriously need a divine’s help on this…

(How the Government’s financial management is going to affect us, the people, in the long run. Image source: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/)

A long, long time ago, when the petrol price was increased, one “work-with-me” PM vowed to use the RM4 billion saved on petrol subsidies on the development of public transportation.

Of course, nothing happened to the improvement of public transportation and when called upon to be accountable to the subsidies saved, only excuses after excuses were given – in the end, RM4 billion simply went “missing”. Considering the amount of money spent by the Government, RM4 billion might be a small amount to some but there is no clear line of sight on whether the money had gone back to the people (the refund of RM625 aside).

Now there are calls for reduction of Government’s subsidies once again.

Reduction of Subsidies

Considering the fact of the global financial trend and the diminishing pool of national oil reserves, at end of the day, subsidies has to go. That is the fact and we need to face this sooner or later.  Subsidies are bad and here’s why. The call for reduction of subsidy is right and timely.

Idris Jala has made the right case for reduction of subsidies when he said:-

Subsidies only result in market distortion and they drain the government of much needed funds that could be better used for more strategic and pressing development projects for the rakyat.

The time for subsidy rationalisation is now.

We do not want to end up like Greece with a total debt of EUR300 billion. Our deficit rose to record high of RM47 billion last year.

If the government continues at the rate of 12 per cent per annum, Malaysia could go bankrupt in 2019 with total debts amounting to RM1,158 billion.

(Source: TheStar)

Why waste money to keep price of things artificially low when the same amount of money can be used for development and generation of economy of the nation? With the Government having more cash at the disposal, they can use it to ensure a better economic environment for business and people. This in turn may translate to higher business profit and taxable income for the individuals.

More cash reserve also means better investment opportunities by Government investment arm. It also means better buffer to engage the poor and provide financial assistance to them. It also means we have more money to pay off our debts whilst we continue with the strengthening our economy.

Perhaps a greater push for alternative energy to reduce the dependant on fossil fuel?

Managing Subsidies Saved

But here is where we start to worry…

When we look at the very jokers who is going to manage the money saved from the subsidies, it is no wonder why many are asking the question – why now (and not when we have plenty of oil lying around in our shores) and why the people (why no change of lifestyle by the Government)?

(Looks good on paper but given the past track record, can the people behind pilot seat make it count? Image source: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/)

To common Malaysians like you and me, the call to reduce the Government subsidies by the billions really sounds like this – more from the people’s pocket and more into the corrupt’s and greed’s pockets.

And the same echoed in Malaysiakini:-

Fiscal austerity is required only when you have a clean management of country’s wealth, otherwise all the rakyat’s belt-tightening will go into the pockets of greedy politicians and businessmen

Asking the rakyat to sacrifice and support the cutting of subsidies, and here they are throwing away the nation’s money. How often do we read this type of news, but no one is sent to jail for misappropriation.

Good question – how many people who been caught for wasting public funds whilst still in Government office have been found guilty and severally punished? What about the million of ringgit which was wasted on an advertisement to congratulate a politician’s wife? What about the joker who wasted thousands of ringgit for a car plate number? Why they are not stripped naked and given the lashes for treating public funds as their own personal funds.

Subsidies on Toll

Out of the many subsidies paid out by the Government, one stands like a sore thumb – subsidies on the toll charges. Unlike increase of petrol price which we cannot do much once we become the net oil importer, the same cannot be said of the increase in toll charges. What global event that causes the increase in toll charges?

The answer is NONE!

(No justification whatsoever for increase of toll charges but the Government’s hands seems to be tied on this)

The only reason we are playing through our noses is because a long time when we needed highways to manage the  ever growing traffic problems, some civil servants and policy makers did not do their duty (that is “to do all they can to protect public’s interest”) properly. Toll concessionaire’s agreement became lopsided agreement and accountability became a secret. So, why the public need to pay more for highway tolls when all is needed is for the Government to review and redraw the contract obligations.

Will the Government have enough courage to say “fuck off” to the toll concessionaires when they come over asking for an increase of toll and demand for re-negotiations? Or they will just silently agree to it and let the people continue to suffer for it?

Policies on Economy

Najib, infamous for his call to people to change their lifestyle is yet to be proven as a leader who goes all out to manage the little resources that the country has and improve on the financial standing. No doubt, there has been plenty of talk on the topic but what about real action?

(NEM strives for better quality of life for the people with higher income and sustained national growth. But the very framework of NEM has been under fire by short sighted people)

Something called NEM was cooked up but already there are objections to it. There is a think tank behind the Government (good for the PM) but no firm policies have been made (meaning think-tank’s recommendations may end up in the dustbin or in danger of major modifications due to political pressure).

No major overhaul of the corruption fighting mechanism have been made – there seems to be an overwhelming tendency to go after the oppositions and where applicable, “small fishes”. Those who suppose to be accountable is still sitting comfortably in their chairs and pointing fingers at others.

What about the policies that promotes cost cutting measure, not only at the public sector but also cutting across Government linked companies? What happen to the KPI at GLC level? Just how much of the cost cutting measures have been implemented and enforced? The very fact that the Auditor General’s yearly report has not shown any good indication of cost cutting measures in place and blatant waste of public funds has been curtailed shows that Government has not been really serious to maximise the resources and source of income.

Cost of Goods

When the petrol prices went up, the price of a glass of teh-tarik at the local mamak restaurant went up substantially. When the price of petrol went down, the price of the teh-tarik did not go down. The owner of the restaurant made plenty of profit by increasing all prices of the food items.

(Want to measure how Government’s decision to increase fuel price and toll affects our daily expenses? Just check out the “latest” price of teh tarik at your local mamak restaurant)

The price of teh-tarik is just an example but an obvious sample where price of petrol affects daily consumer goods in a big way. The price of sugar, flour and cooking oil is expected to increase and there is no indication that there will be close monitoring of other items’ price. If the price of 3 basic items is going up, rest assured, others will follow suit.

With the planned reduction of subsidies, price of petrol, toll and others will also increase. With the increase of petrol and toll, we can only expect transportation cost to increase and when this happens, goods delivered will cost more too.

What the Government plans to do about this? How they are going to manage when price of goods sky-rockets? Are they going to do what they have done in the past – simply complain about it but do nothing?

Poor Implementation & Enforcement

MCA President, a couple of days ago said:-

Weaknesses in the implementation of Government policies have resulted in the disgruntled Chinese community wrongly assuming the Barisan Nasional is not doing anything for them

What Chua Soi Lek has said is not something new – it is something everyone already had known for a long time now. Chua Soi Lek only talked about weaknesses in implementation but there is more to it than just this.

We all agree that there is weakness in implementation of policies but it does not happen only in Malaysia. So, we are not really alone in this but what we want is “less talking and more action”.  Have we find out where are the weaknesses and quickly plug the weaknesses so that implementation is done without delays or unfairly? Has this been done in line with the expected reduction of subsidies?

To keep talking about weaknesses without talking about plugging in the weaknesses is nothing short of plain ignorance. Same goes for the quality of enforcement in Malaysia where sometimes more bite for enforcement is tainted with political pressure.

Final Say

But let’s say that God was kind on Malaysians and decide to wipe out corrupted, racists and good-for-nothing politicians and Government civil servants from the face of the earth and replace them with true nationalist, professional and idealistic people. What happens next?

We will go for the reduction of subsidies willingly – it is necessary after all. What ever the Government managed to save from these subsidies, then should be re-channeled to the people in form of tax relief, rebates, reduction of debt and certainly increase in taxable income. That is the right way to do, not the current way of pushing the buck back to the people whilst the politicians and the rich hold back and shake leg and whilst strict measures to handle the people’s burden due to increase of expenses is not been formulated and implemented.

We are against reduction of subsidies, not because we want the subsidies to be kept going (for ever and ever) – it is not good for the nation in the long run. We are against the reduction of subsidies because we know the subsidies saved will not be properly managed.